can experience hearing voices, mind reading, directed energy attacks and more)

site contains information relating to advanced satellite surveillance and
“harassment” technologies which are made available to covert government
agencies and organised crime syndicates.

secret technologies in question are covered by military/agency secrecy orders,
mostly obtained under the US Inventions Secrecy Act, 1951. There are currently
over 5,000 hidden devices, many computer – based and satellite facilitated, all
with military / criminal applications. A list of known patents is available on
the “Surveillance” page after the article on “Social Engineering”. Neurophones,
brain scanners and brain wave vocabulary software, directed energy and E-M
weapons are amongst these as are technologies to affect the weather, cause
earthquakes etc etc. Undemocratically, and to protect powerful criminals from
scrutiny,various other Secrecy, National Security and Defamation legislation
has been enhanced in recent years.

US Patriot Act, for example, protects governments and connected criminals from
criticism and/or detection and prosecution. Under this act anyone
whistleblowing or fighting the system on a major concern is arbitrarily deemed
to be unpatriotic (when it’s the criminals they criticise who betray us). They
can then be listed (by a senior politician or at the request, through them, of
a connected criminal) as a security risk and harassed covertly; using secret
technologies. In fact a Dep’t Of Defense Directive, Directive 5240 1-R, 1994,
gives open permission for those under surveillance to be used for remote
experimentation. It’s no coincidence that this particularly undemocratic and
evil move was followed in 1996 by a significant increase in the number of
satellites deployed for the purpose of civilian surveillance and harassment.
Over 20,000 satellites currently target and silence countless people worldwide
(est. 500,000 plus) as a result of such bad laws. The victims are not openly
confronted as that would remove any feigned excuses and leave the perpetrators
open to all manner of accusation. Instead the methods used are covert;
employing high tech’ to remotely torment and deceive victims without leaving
evidence. Often targets are tricked into believing they are having psychic,
medical, psychiatric, religious or even alien experiences (which they are not).
This leaves them discredited as they vainly seek help from ignorant or
complicit authorities (police, MPs, doctors, media etc). This leaves them
neutralised and possibly even silenced on the issue they originally raised. This,
along with various research aspects, is the purpose of the exercise.

situation is getting worse not better with more and more secretive,
undemocratic legislation being sneaked past the unwary public all the time.
State treachery and terrorism are behind it yet it is all hidden under the
guise of “the war on terror”. For example, the US gov’t just passed the
National Defense Authorisation Act, 2012, giving the President (and others) the
power to target and silence anyone questioning State corruption. When this is
done openly in other countries the US is the first to condemn such evil yet
when they are guilty of the same they do it in secret and no-one dares to
criticise lest they join the ranks of those they persecute. So much for gov’t
of the people, for the people and by the people. The criminals who do such
things abuse their authority, betray our trust and secretly mock the democratic
ideals they publicly support. They don’t serve us, they simply help themselves
and their criminal associates. By using stealth they can feign ignorance and
hide their true nature from most.

In the USA over 300,000 NSL’s (National Security Letters) have already been
issued. These allow the agency targeting of innocent civilians whose objections
to corruption / crime in high places have been deliberately skewed or
misinterpreted as a threat to powerful people. Once placed in a program people
can be abused and experimented on, from a distance (using satellites / high
tech’). This effectively silences and discredits them while providing agency
researchers with guinea pigs for experiments in control, brain function,
dreams, health, robotics and much more. Post 9/11, $750 billion per year has
been spent on satellite weapons used for human experimentation / targeting. Most
of this has found it’s way from gov’t coffers to about 80 defense contractors
who are also culpable for the crimes against humanity that are addressed on
this site.

is a circular / Catch 22 type problem in that governments use “classified”
covers to hide criminal activity (esp. if it is an unconstitutional act) but
targets can’t prove any of that BECAUSE it has been classified…. Eg. NSA
Whistleblower William Binney in an interview (see
points out that Executive Order 13526 section 1.7 (covering classified status
allocation) specifically says that **”You cannot classify information merely to
cover up a crime”**. Even if devices or procedures are classified this also
applies to them and information on them when they are being used for criminal
purposes. So, in theory, by misusing devices, abusing authority and so on the
administration not only commits crimes but should open up the information relating
to that for public scrutiny…(Government of, by and for the people). Now
Presidents Obama and Bush both signed this executive order 13526 so if any of
these hidden crimes was to be presented to the US Supreme Court then any
current US leader could be impeached as having breached their oath of
office…which includes upholding the constitution. The ECHELON spying system,
neurophone harassment, remote neural monitoring, the use of directed energy
weapons and more are all clearly crimes against the people and humanity in
general and so by classifying the devices the government and it’s leaders are
breaching the constitution as well. As with any crime the break in the loop
between the acts, investigation, trial and incarceration is the lack of proof.
“Classifying” information and calling it a matter of National Security negates
the need for the criminals involved to even create excuses for their conduct.
The ability of government to classify crime is what must be fought.

the US military is supposed to be prohibited by law from targeting US citizens
with PSYOPS within US borders under Executive Order S-1233, DOD directive
S-3321.1 and National Security Directive 130. Of course there’s no-one to
police that especially since Psyops, by their very nature, are difficult to
prove. This is particularly so where the secret weapons discussed on this web
site are employed. Also nothing stops agencies, US or allied, from doing that
dirty work and hiding it under the National Security carpet. Nonetheless,
public discussion of these Psyops crimes is beginning see Dr Keith Ablow,
psychiatrist of Fox News. [

previously The International Commitee of the Red Cross (ICRC) raised the issue
of psychotronic weapons; firstly in 1994, then the 2002 Geneva Forum and then
the 2009 5th Symposium on non-lethal weapons. The EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT passed a
“Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy” – A4-0005/99,
January 28th, 1999 which called for “An international convention introducing a
global ban on ALL development and deployment of weapons which might enable any
form of manipulation of human beings”…”It is our conviction that this ban can
not be implemented without the global pressure of the informed general public
on governments. Our major objective is to get across to the general public the
real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to
apply pressure on the governments and the parliaments around the world to enact
legislation which would prohibit the use of these devices to both government
AND private organisations as well as individuals”. (Plenary sessions / European
Parliament, 1999). ]

this site the author seeks to provide a community service; to inform the
general public and encourage forthright but peaceful protest against the
corporate/military/government crimes outlined herein.

should also add that whilst the topic of violence (as a sad reality) was
addressed in my fictional novel, “In the year 2252″, at no stage and in no way
was it my intention to encourage violent responses to the real life criminal
conduct of corrupt members of corporate/government/military organisations.
Passive resistance to oppression is the only acceptable method … but resist we

Paul Baird

(please put ‘surveillance’ in the subject line)