TELEGRAM

 (Source – US Congress
Office of Technology Assessment)

Electronic
Eavesdropping Technology

–
(Audio Surveillance)

• Radiating
  devices & receivers (e.g. miniature radio & ultrasonic
  transmitters)
• Non-radiating
  devices (eg wired surveillance systems including phone taps and concealed
  microphones)
• Tape
  recorders
• Laser-facilitated
  listening devices, rifle mikes and other “remote ” equipment (incl.
  satellites)

N.B.
Even phones can be made “hot on the hook” i.e. turned into microphones when not
in use.

Optical/Imaging
Technology

–
(Visual Surveillance)

• Photographic
  techniques (incl. zoom lens and infra red cameras)
• Television
  (e.g. closed circuit)
• Night
  vision devices (e.g. image intensifiers)
• Satellite
  based viewing (up to and including the monitoring of writings as they are
  written; indoors)
• Aircraft
  facilitated viewing

Computers
& Related Technologies

–
(Data Surveillance)

• Microcomputers
  – decentralisation of machines and distributed processing
• Computer
  networks
• Software
  (eg. expert systems)
• Pattern
  recognition systems
• Voice
  Activated & thought activated computers (incl. “remote” equipment)

N.B.
In many countries the military operates tracking stations; assisting the giant
American National Security Agency. The NSA covertly monitors every call, fax,
e-mail, telex and computer data message. The relevant computers search for key
words/phrases. Anything/anyone of interest is drawn to the attention of agency
operatives. This can lead to a large scale personal surveillance operation by
the NSA or other agencies; like the CIA and their criminal connections. The
current system is called ECHELON.

Sensor
Technology

• Magnetic
  sensors
• Seismic
  sensors
• Infra
  red sensors
• Strain
  sensors
• Electromagnetic
  sensors (incl. brain wave sensors)

Other
Devices and Technologies

• CB
  radios
• Vehicle
  location systems (incl. satellite tracking)
• Machine
  readable magnetic strips
• Polygraphs
• Voice
  stress analysers
• Laser
  interception devices
• Cellular
  radio
• Anti
  personnel weapons – sonic and phasar weapons as well as psychotronic
  weapons; which target the nervous system. (These have been trialed in riot
  control in France etc)
• Scalar
  wave weapons – (scalar waves emanate naturally from living organisms and
  the earth itself).
• Infrasound
  weapons – inducing various forms of illness from remote sources (Also used
  on dissidents in France)
• Neurophones
  and similar (more advanced) technologies – Satellite or ground based.
  These can deliver aural harassment via microwaves or lasers aimed at the
  target. Visual harassment laser systems. These deliver blurred vision,
  holographs and so on to disorientate the target and/or experiment;
  victims’ reactions being monitored to study how best to “control” targets.
• Brain
  wave monitors/analysers (remote sensing). These newer technologies
  actually allow the target’s thoughts to be interpreted.
• “Over
  the horizon” technologies – These facilitate ground-based methods of
  harassment (eg The Alaskan HAARP project which bounces signals off the
  ionosphere).
• The
  NSA’s Echelon and Prism systems, which are now in the public domain thanks
  to whistleblowers, monitor ALL telecommunications worldwide. Programmed
  phrases / words are highlighted and those drawing the attention of the
  computers monitoring are then targeted by operatives using other
  technologies. The principle targets are not terrorists or criminals but
  rather opponents of those powerful criminals who are protected by this
  very system. National Security claims are a bogus excuse for establishing
  such systems then misusing them in secret.

N.B.
There are literally hundreds of ways of tracking the earth’s inhabitants which
are available to corrupt agency officials and their criminal contacts (e.g. the
mafia). The last seven are examples of devices used to covertly menace
political targets who do not have a public profile. Most can be satellite based
and anyone can be targeted provided they have neither influence nor contacts in
public life. Government secrecy provisions help to prevent public disclosures
regarding these technologies. However, there is more than an element of
corruption / complicity evident amongst politicians, journalists and other
public figures who are aware of what goes on. Others are afraid to interfere.

Further
Information

It
is evident that countless people (world wide) have already lodged complaints
about the following technologies. They are available to government agencies,
defense contractors and “organised” crime figures.

• The
  Neurophone
  
  Although the offered explanations for “Hearing Voices” can include
  everything from trickery to hidden transmitters to tinnitus to
  psychic/haunting experiences to possession or encounters with God/aliens
  (to so – called schizophrenic episodes) by far the most common REAL reason
  is covert Neurophone harassment as arranged by government agencies and/or
  other criminals.

US Patent # 3,393,279. July 16th, 1968

US Patent # 3,647,970. March 7th, 1972

The Neurophone was developed by Dr Patrick Flanagan in 1958. It’s a device that
converts sound to electrical impulses. In its original form electrodes were
placed on the skin but with defence department developments, the signals can be
delivered via satellite. They then travel the nervous system directly to the
brain (bypassing normal hearing mechanisms). Dr Flanagan’s “3D holographic
sound system” can place sounds in any location as perceived by the targeted /
tortured listener. This allows for a variety of deceptions for gullible
victims.

Today, the CIA, DIA (etc) use satellites and ground – based
equipment to deliver verbal threats, deafening noise and propaganda; using
neurophone technology. Anything from TV’s/radio’s appearing to operate when
switched off through to “Voices from God” and encounters with “telepathic”
aliens are all cons using neurophone technologies to torment, deceive and (most
importantly) discredit agency/criminal targets. Naturally, the system can mimic
anyone’s voice and automatic computer translations (into any language) are
incorporated.

Anecdotal evidence indicates that people like David Koresh, Martin
Bryant and others could have been programmed then remotely triggered (or
tricked) using harassment technologies like the neurophone. (Although most of
the targets are intelligent and law-abiding). For example, John Lennon’s
killer, Mark Chapman, reportedly heard voices before and after silencing the
agency-hounded peace advocate. “God” apparently told him to confess verbally.

To explain why others physically moving into the path of the laser
(or whatever) do not pick up the signals, please note the following
“possibilities”…

a) Kirlean photography may be an ancillary system so it’s attuned to the
targets personal energy field (their unique EM waves).

b) The magnetite in our brains can act as a detectable fingerprint.

c)Equally each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in our
brains. EMF Brain stimulation may be encoded so that pulsating EM signals sent
to the targets brain cause audio-visual effects which only the target experiences.
This, to me, is the best explanation.

d) The individuals “vibrational pattern” could be used as a signal filter like
a radio receiving only the sound modulating the frequency of the station it’s
tuned to.

e) The monitors simply adjust the volume downwards when you’re in a position
where the signal could hit someone else’s body. Even if they heard it (briefly)
they’d attribute it to another voice in the crowd etc.

As with the final proof, the definitive answer lies in the actual
blueprints; secreted in the bowels of the Pentagon or some similar facility.
Nonetheless, there is no report of ANY intercepted neurophone signals. If it
wasn’t so effective it would not have been used to facilitate silent
communications between U.S. government agents/military personnel.

• Psycho-Acoustic
  Projector
  
  U.S. patent #3,566,347, (23/2/71)
  
  A device/weapon which can actually deafen the target.
• Silent
  Subliminal Messages
  
  US Patent # 5,159,703. October 27th, 1992
  
  Inventor – Dr Oliver M. Lowery
  
  Non aural carriers in extreme audio frequency ranges are amplified or
  modulated with the desired material and propagated acoustically for direct
  inducement into the brain. This is an excellent method of influencing
  people without their knowledge. An alert reader would recognise how this
  could create coincidences and stir up conflict; especially if what’s fed
  to one person corresponds with what’s gathered (via surveillance) from
  another. It can also help to create coincidences of the sort the media
  creates (through surveillance feedback) only in reverse… where the
  subjects are fed information prior to the event (eg. a news story) and
  coerced into believing they are psychic.

Patented devices known to facilitate subliminal message delivery
are too numerous to list. However, examples include: – Auditory subliminal
message system and method. U.S. patent #4395600, Rene Lundy and David Tyler,
26/7/83. A system to mix messages into background music (ala the subliminal
transmissions used in some U.S. department stores to prevent shoplifting or boost
sales).

– Subliminal message generator. U.S. patent #5,270,800, Robert Sweet, 14/12/93.
To be used with TV, cable TV and computers. (A visual medium).

– Superimposing method and apparatus useful for subliminal messages. U.S.
patent #5,134,484, Joseph Wilson, 28/7/92. Relates to video signals. The
subliminal data can be from a prerecorded or live signal.

And yes… the entertainment industry can use such technologies to boost sales of
CD’s, movie tickets etc. As intimated earlier, the criminals involved not only
operate in media/political circles, they seek total control of everything. In
time they may win due to suppression of information and their terrorist
tactics.

N.B Sound can also be induced by radiating the head with
microwaves. One unpublished application was the Gulf War but, more times than
not, the targets are mostly innocent/oppressed civilians trying to exercise
their basic rights to free speech in so-called western democracies.

• Methods
  and Systems of Altering Consciousness
  
  US Patent # 5,123,844. June 23rd, 1992
  
  US Patent # 5,289,438. February 22nd, 1994
  
  These systems stimulate the brain with different frequencies and wave
  forms to alter the subject’s state of consciousness.

Electro Magnetic Field (EMF) monitoring/interference is one of the
most insidious and secretive of all methods used by the agencies.

N.B. Similarly, EEG cloning feeds back the results of EMF
monitoring in an attempt to induce emotional responses (e.g. fear, anger, even
sleep etc.).

This could possibly work on certain members of a crowd or
audience….again this could facilitate scams etc.

Dr Ross Adey concludes that all aspects of human behaviour can be
affected, even controlled. He used 0.75 milliwatts per square centimetre of
pulsed, modulated microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz.

Notably the Alaskan HAARP project (featuring the B.J.Eastland
patented technology – U.S. patent #4,686,605, 11/4/87 – “Method and Apparatus
for altering a region in the Earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere or magnetosphere”.
AND others) also facilitates experiments in the disruption of human mental
processes. It’s the largest, most versatile radio frequency radiation
transmitter in the world also allowing experimentation in weather
“modification”, wireless, electrical power beaming and communications “disruption”.
Its systems like this which could one day see attempts made to
brainwash/control entire populations. And that is just as feasible as a
wholesale nuclear holocaust.

• Microwave
  Weapons
  
  Twenty years ago a scientist, Allan Frey, found that if a microwave
  carrier were to be sliced and carried audio modulation, that modulation
  could be heard by someone in the signals path. The thin pulses of radio
  carrier wave cause currents to flow through the nervous system – the
  result is a remote transmission; no wires or contact is needed.

“A hearing system” U.S. patent #4,877,027, 31/10/89. Wayne
Brunker.

“A hearing device” U.S. patent #4,858,612, 22/8/89. Philip L.Stocklin.

Eg. The latter involves microwaves aimed at the auditory cortex. A
mike turns the sounds to electrical signals which are treated so as to provide
multi frequency microwaves which are applied to the brain area. Whatever sound
the mike picks up (like a voice) is relayed to the target.

The first known experiment with microwaved voices was conducted by
Sharp and Grove in the early 70’s. However, the Defence Intelligence Agency and
ARPA (The Advanced Research Projects Agency) are principally to blame for the
abuse of such technologies since. eg Project Pandora etc. The CIA’s Langley
Research Centre as well as an army of “mad” scientists working in
Energy/Defence department labs across the U.S. are also responsible.

As with the NASA Apollo program, many of those originally involved
were ex Nazi or Russian Cold war scientists (even WWII Japanese) recruited,
regardless of their earlier crimes, to commit more crimes, this time for the
U.S.A.

It’s worth noting the reported experiments carried out in bygone
days included The MKULTRA (mind control)/LSD experiments, germ and nuclear
fallout testing (on military and civilian personnel), electro-shock treatment
on institutional victims and so on. The U.S. Energy and Justice departments are
now involved in such programs so the U.S. can escape violation of international
defence/agency treaties. That’s also why the “D” for “defence” was dropped from
DARPA.

In any event, once a technology is labelled “Top
secret-classified” they can use it any way they like on anyone. God Bless
America.

• Brain
  Wave Monitors / Analysers
  
  Lawrence Pinneo, a neurophysiologist and electronic engineer working for
  Stanford Research Institute (a military contractor) is the first “known”
  pioneer in this field.

In 1974 he developed a computer system which correlated brain
waves on an electroencephalograph with specific commands.

In the early 1990s, Dr Edward Taub reported that words could be
communicated onto a screen using the thought-activated movements of a computer
cursor.

(Currently under secrecy provisions; “Classified”)

In 1994, the brain wave patterns of 40 subjects were officially correlated with
both spoken words and silent thought. This was achieved by a neurophysiologist,
Dr Donald York, and a speech pathologist, Dr Thomas Jensen, from the University
of Missouri. They clearly identified 27 words / syllables in specific brain
wave patterns and produced a computer program with a brain wave vocabulary.

It does not take much thinking to realise that the US agencies
have access to a perfected version of this technology. In fact the relevant
computers have a vocabulary in excess of 60,000 words and cover most languages.

In fact, the NSA’s signals intelligence monitor the brainwaves of
their targets by satellite and decode the evoked potentials (3.50Hz 5
milliwatts) that the brain emits.

So, using lasers / satellites and high-powered computers the
agencies have now gained the ability to decipher human thoughts – and from a
considerable distance (instantaneously).

• How
  is it done?
  
  The magnetic field around the head, the brain waves of an individual can
  be monitored by satellite. The transmitter is therefore the brain itself
  just as body heat is used for “Iris” satellite tracking (infrared) or
  mobile phones or bugs can be tracked as “transmitters”. In the case of
  brain wave monitoring the results are then fed back to the relevant
  computers. Monitors then use the information to conduct a “conversation”
  where audible neurophone input is “applied” to the victim.

Human thought operates at 5,000 bits/sec but satellites and
various forms of biotelemetry can deliver those thoughts to supercomputers in
Maryland, U.S.A, Israel, etc which have a speed of over 300 trillion bits/sec
which means just one (Blue Gene) supercomputer can process more information
than ten times the entire world’s population. These, even today, monitor
millions of people simultaneously. Eventually they will monitor almost
everyone…worse than any Orwellian “Big Brother” nightmare you could possibly
imagine, only it will be a reality. Yet our world leaders, who know this, do
nothing.

NB Whilst the live/human comments are individualistic and
unrelated to the victims own thought processes oftentimes the artificial
intelligence involved will parrot standard phrases. These are triggered by your
thoughts while the human monitors remain silent or absent.

To comprehend how terrible such a thorough invasion of privacy can
be – imagine being quizzed on your past as you lie in bed. You eventually fall
off to sleep, having personal or “induced” dreams, only to wake to the monitors
commenting / ridiculing your subconscious thoughts (dreams).

If the ability to “brain scan” individuals expands from the
million or so currently under scrutiny to include ALL inhabitants of the planet
(as per the Echelon surveillance system which already monitors ALL
private/commercial telecommunications) then no-one will ever be able to even
think about expressing an opinion contrary to those forced on us by the New
World Order. There will literally be no intellectual property that cannot be
stolen, no writing that cannot be censored, no thought that cannot be
suppressed (by the most oppressive/invasive means).

Conclusion

The
combined use of these technologies enables remote torture and interrogation.
(Memories are triggered by neurophone questioning and the brain wave analysers
deliver the answers). Any nebulous arguments about US national security and the
need for classified research on human subjects speak for themselves. (The
writer has a copy of a White House internal memo, signed by Bill Clinton on
these matters).

Remember
that in the past CIA mind control experiments have involved LSD as well as
electro-shock treatment.

The
MK Ultra (Mind Control) program itself is infamous as are the instances where
implants have been detected by X-Ray etc. Also there are those experimented on
under the the cover of ‘Alien visits’. Today, Neurophone and mind reading
technologies are at the forefront of similar programs. In many ways these new
technologies are an even more sinister means of conducting illegal human
experiments.

Colonel
John Alexander, advising head of NATO’S non-lethal weapon initiative, is the
main proponent of these technologies. He favours all manner of devices which
can, from a distance, induce illnesses, read minds and covertly harass innocent
targets. If he could he would implant a microchip in each newborn child and initiate
a mind control programme designed to brainwash the entire planet or at least
those not fully in tune with their New World Order. Even to entertain such a
thought is criminally insane yet he has said such things in public. In fact
Scientific American magazine and the major Scandinavian newspaper, Helsingen
Sanomat, have suggested all people will be implanted with a DNA microchip in
the future. E.g Prince William has already been implanted (for “location”
purposes?) while some U.S Military/Agency personnel, including NASA astronauts,
have been implanted so as to study their thoughts/emotions etc. Think of the
possibilities for robotics and cloning in the future.

Remember,
these technologies (developed for times of war / terrorism) are (post cold war)
being used today on lobbyists, intellectual dissenters and peaceful activists;
to discredit and silence them. (So much for democracy.) Notably different
methods are often used on different victims within a certain area (city) so as
to avoid providing a pattern for investigators to observe. This also provides a
cross section of political targets for their experimental programs.

It
is also noteworthy that some of the victims are ex-agency / military personnel
who have rebelled or tried to blow the whistle on corrupt practices within
these organisations. Some of these report that not only have the thoughts and
emotions of millions of targets been catalogued by military/intelligence
agencies but all such agencies have political/mafia/media links due to both infiltration
and association. Many of the actual monitors/harassers are also recruited from
the worst possible sources.

These
people also report that experiments in controlling voters by these remote
methods were tried in Haiti, Bosnia etc AND that in 1994, the U.S D.O.D
proposed using such technology on all individuals opposing their views(and
competitors etc). The DIA would know.

N.B.
These technologies are invariably used in conjuction with satellite (audio /
visual) surveillance; creating the effect of an electronic POW concentration
camp. Mental rape is only one of the many crimes committed in this mobile
environment. E.g scientists, writers, political/military leaders etc can have
their intellectual property stolen at the source. Without doubt the computers
store and analyse the intelligence gathered by surveillance/harassment
technologies. Their vast memories allow detailed studies of how the human mind
works so as to learn how to influence and/or control people. Duplicating these
processes for robotics and other artificial intelligence purposes is another
sinister goal.

The
US and other world governments are guilty of fostering gross human rights
abuses by using these methods. Their covert operators can now do their worst
without fear of detection. The cost is justified by the control gained and the
experimental results achieved. Of course, (as with the space program and
military expenditures in general) the funds used could be better spent solving
real problems like hunger, disease, poverty and crime.

Recommendations

• Agencies
  such as the CIA, ASIS and ASIO should be accountable to appropriately
  selected committees etc.
• Military
  units, like Australia’s DSD and the U.S. DIA, should not have the right to
  access satellite (or other) technologies to spy on or harass law-abiding
  citizens; especially in their own country. Equally they should not assist
  foreign governments with ‘Big Brother’ systems like Echelon, except where
  assisting with law enforcement activities (which they do not).
• Federal
  Police should be able to access oscillating scanners and EEG machines like
  SQUID (Superconductor Quantum Interface Detector) through the defence
  department or appropriate facilities. These can detect the relevant
  frequencies and this provides proof.
• There
  needs to be a United Nations Satellite Committee to oversee developments
  in satellite technology from a humanitarian perspective.
• UN
  weapons inspectors should include non-lethal weapons and satellite
  weaponry on their checklists.
• The
  International Criminal Court should deny veto rights to the US government.
  The threat of class actions against US government departments may then
  lead to the end of these atrocities.

WHAT’S
BEING DONE ABOUT IT

(i)
Pres. Bill Clinton issued a memo and an Admin’ order of governmental Federal
Policy change but it was not implemented before he left office. It related to
“Strengthened protection for human subjects of classified research”, 27th
March, 1997. (May 13th, 1997….Federal register). His wife, Hillary Clinton,
later as US Secretary of State (responsible for the agencies), made no further
attempt to stop the atrocities in question.

(ii)
Senator John Glen introduced the “Human research subject protection act”
(s.193, 105th congress, Jan 22, 1997). As an ex astronaut he knew full well how
necessary this was but the bill was not passed.

(iii)
The European Parliament recently passed resolutions calling for a world
convention to ban all weapons used for human experimentation/manipulation. (see
Resolution on the environment security and foreign policy A4 – 0005/99, Jan
28th, 1999.EP1159). The European Parliament also called for a convention
introducing a global ban on any weaponry enabling manipulation of human beings.
The International Committee of the Red Cross also expressed its concerns in
July ’94.

(iv)
UNIDIR (The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research) has issued a
media guide to disarmament esp. re weapons of mass destruction. Non-lethal
weapons are listed and the list includes mind control weapons. Resolutions,
treaties, international conventions/laws must quickly be introduced to bridge
the gap between rapidly advancing (and usually ‘classified’) technologies and
inadequate laws. UN weapons inspectors should then seek access to government
(et al) facilities (worldwide – including the U.S.) to eradicate these evil
weapons.

(v)
ON 28TH DECEMBER 2003 THE MICHIGAN GOVERNOR SIGNED PUBLIC ACTS 256 AND 257
(EFFECTIVE 1/1/04). THESE OUTLAW THE USE OF ANY EM WEAPON ON ANYONE. PENALTY –
15 YEARS-LIFE.

(vi)
US Rep Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) introduced a bill “The space preservation act of
2001″ (HR 2977). This was an attempt to ban all weapons in space, including the
ones referred to on this site. The congressional record shows that “Mind
Control”, “Psychotronic” and “Mood Management” weapons were referred to in HR
2977 but the bill had to be reintroduced as HR 3616 as a watered down version
that excluded such terms. Like the earlier attempts by Pres. Clinton and Sen.
Glenn this failed to shore up the loopholes which allow non-consensual human
experimentation by the agencies and the military. And, like most things kept
from the public, these secretive crimes, allowed by the deliberate placement of
bad laws, are undemocratic, abhorrent and inspired by an inhumane, elitist
mentality that the Nazis and Dr Mengele himself would be proud of.

The
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) filed a lawsuit in early 2012 against the
US government ( Obama administration) concerning the covert targeting / killing
of individuals by the agencies; with executive approval or orders.

However
these are only promises recognising the problem. None have yet bore fruit. The
use of most “non-lethal” weapons contravenes the spirit of all privacy laws and
criminal codes as well as every relevant code and convention in play
internationally; including The Declaration of Human Rights. The International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The Geneva Convention and The Nuremberg
Code. The perpetrators are guilty of crimes against humanity. Those supporting
them are engaging in class warfare of the worst kind.

HEROES

Some of the martyrs to the cause are listed below. These people, all of which
spoke with authority and inside knowledge, were all murdered for blowing the
whistle on covert satellite harassment….

• Bill
  Roy, ANU lecturer and Chief
  Technician, Canberra Black Mountain Tower. He was planning to enter
  politics and tell the world the truth about satellite surveillance /
  harassment. He was run down while on his bike, alone in the Uni’ grounds
  after dark.
• Dr
  Fred Bell, Physicist and ex DOD employee.
  He was speaking publicly about evil attacks on citizens using classified
  technologies. He was murdered in his hotel room just after speaking on
  Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy show on TruTV.

Ironically, he was the great grandson of Alexander Graham Bell who
invented the “telephone” while he himself was killed for telling people about
“neurophones”, amongst other things.

• Ted
  Gunderson, Ex FBI agent. Ted was an
  effective activist that assisted many and worked tirelessly to resolve
  this situation. He died suddenly in suspicious circumstances.
• Alistair
  Stuart, a Psychiatrist. He was
  discredited then murdered in his home for highlighting the number of
  political / agency targets who were falsely committed to mental
  institutions in order to silence them.
• Michael
  Hastings – He was a journalist working on
  a story about the CIA chief when killed in a very suspicious accident in
  2013. He had also previously ended the career of General McChrystal.

LIVING HEROES

• Bradley
  Manning – Jailed in 2013 for 35 years
  (hopefully to be paroled much sooner if not pardoned altogether) for
  passing on military information to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. His
  motivation was seeing atrocities in Iraq whilst serving there. His concern
  was for others. In the absence of adequate reporting channels, media
  coverage or government accountability for such human rights abuses only
  whistleblowers can bring such things to the attention of the public and
  then only through marginalised organisations. This of course conveniently
  allows the government to hide most crimes and demonise those reporting
  them. The most apt comment I read on this matter read something like this:
  “When exposing a crime is able to be called a crime by the criminals who
  commited it you can be sure that those same criminals rule”. The US
  miltary and agencies manipulate the truth and brainwash the public so that
  those not thinking straight support their views, giving them at least some
  leeway to get away with injustices such as imprisoning Mr Manning. Talk of
  fictional “psych’ ” problems is always a last resort and they also used
  that in his case.
• Julian
  Assange – He published the Manning
  documents / revelations en masse through Wikileaks and has been hounded
  for it to the point where he’s sought political asylum from the gov’t of
  Ecuador. The big lie used on him concerns some obvious sexual frame up.
  Like other whistleblowers, he has been demonised for speaking the truth
  which has become a crime or revolutionary act according to the criminals
  committing the crimes. How the guilty turn the accusations back onto the
  innocent in today’s evil world would have been a valuable clue for the
  despots of the past who would be in awe of what technology and total
  control of the information flow have delivered to the masters of today’s
  evil world.
• Edward
  Snowden – Attacked to the point where he
  sought asylum in China then Russia, for revealing to Guardian reporter
  Glenn Greenwald the extent of the NSA’s PRISM surveillance system; gathering
  all information from all communications from all citizens. Like William
  Binney before him, also an NSA whistleblower re’ ECHELON and other
  systems, he’s been victimised and set up to look like a traitor. Again, as
  with the quote for Mr Manning, I say: When exposing treachery is able to
  be called treachery by the traitors responsible you can be sure that those
  same powerful traitors rule.

Jesus
Christ, who IS the truth, said that “the world” hated him because he said that
it was evil (the truth). When men like those mentioned above say the same they
are treated the same; with lies and set ups, fuelled by merciless hatred and
ending in ultimate injustice by the rulers of “the world”. “The whole world is
under the rule of the evil one” said Jesus. It was true then and it’s true now.
“In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act”,
George Orwell.